https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169331 The Supreme Court upheld the detention order, ruling it valid despite the petitioner's discharge in the criminal case, the nine-month interval between incidents and the order, the absence of a specified detention period, and the acts constituting a disturbance of public order. The Court emphasized the need for ongoing government review to justify prolonged detention. en-us Fri, 15 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:43:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169331 The Supreme Court upheld the detention order, ruling it valid despite the petitioner's discharge in the criminal case, the nine-month interval between incidents and the order, the absence of a specified detention period, and the acts constituting a disturbance of public order. The Court emphasized the need for ongoing government review to justify prolonged detention. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169331