https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169327 Preventive detention under the National Security Act was discussed as sustainable where relevant material showed a real likelihood of prejudicial conduct affecting public order. The Court accepted that the order need not fail merely because every incident mentioned was independently sufficient, and earlier incidents could be used as background to show antecedents and propensity. Delay in making the order was not fatal when explained by custody status and imminent release on bail. Allegations of discrimination, non-placement of material, non-supply of the detainee's own application, and non-consideration of representation were rejected for want of prejudice or because the representation had in fact been considered. en-us Mon, 08 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 May 2015 10:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169327 Preventive detention under the National Security Act was discussed as sustainable where relevant material showed a real likelihood of prejudicial conduct affecting public order. The Court accepted that the order need not fail merely because every incident mentioned was independently sufficient, and earlier incidents could be used as background to show antecedents and propensity. Delay in making the order was not fatal when explained by custody status and imminent release on bail. Allegations of discrimination, non-placement of material, non-supply of the detainee's own application, and non-consideration of representation were rejected for want of prejudice or because the representation had in fact been considered. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169327