https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169326 The Supreme Court upheld the detention order, emphasizing that the delay in making the order did not invalidate it, as thorough investigation and procedural steps were necessary. The Court found that the detaining authority had applied its mind, as the grounds for detention were justified. Additionally, the lack of precision in the purpose of detention did not invalidate the order, as the primary purpose was to prevent the appellant from acting prejudicially to public order. The Court also noted that there was no inordinate delay in disposing of the appellant's representation, ultimately dismissing the appeal and writ petition. en-us Tue, 10 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169326 The Supreme Court upheld the detention order, emphasizing that the delay in making the order did not invalidate it, as thorough investigation and procedural steps were necessary. The Court found that the detaining authority had applied its mind, as the grounds for detention were justified. Additionally, the lack of precision in the purpose of detention did not invalidate the order, as the primary purpose was to prevent the appellant from acting prejudicially to public order. The Court also noted that there was no inordinate delay in disposing of the appellant's representation, ultimately dismissing the appeal and writ petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169326