https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169324 The court held that at the stage of framing charge or taking cognizance, the accused has no right to produce any material. The decision in *Satish Mehra's case* allowing the trial court to consider material produced by the accused at the stage of Section 227 of the Code was overruled. Criminal Appeal No. 497 of 2001 was allowed, setting aside the High Court's judgment, while Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 1912 of 2003 and Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 2004 were dismissed. The trial courts were directed to expeditiously conclude the trials. en-us Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Dec 2015 09:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169324 The court held that at the stage of framing charge or taking cognizance, the accused has no right to produce any material. The decision in *Satish Mehra's case* allowing the trial court to consider material produced by the accused at the stage of Section 227 of the Code was overruled. Criminal Appeal No. 497 of 2001 was allowed, setting aside the High Court's judgment, while Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 1912 of 2003 and Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 2004 were dismissed. The trial courts were directed to expeditiously conclude the trials. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169324