<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (3) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169323</link>
    <description>Section 3 of the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 was construed broadly to permit both general and special orders, including directions to particular persons or in respect of specific commodities, and to support seizure measures in aid of control. Sections 4 and 15 reinforced that construction, and sub-section (2) was treated as illustrative rather than limiting the general power in sub-section (1). A seizure order referring to an anticipated contravention was upheld because that recital was merely redundant and did not affect validity. Obstruction of officers executing the lawful seizure accordingly fell within section 186 of the Indian Penal Code.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:55:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (3) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169323</link>
      <description>Section 3 of the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 was construed broadly to permit both general and special orders, including directions to particular persons or in respect of specific commodities, and to support seizure measures in aid of control. Sections 4 and 15 reinforced that construction, and sub-section (2) was treated as illustrative rather than limiting the general power in sub-section (1). A seizure order referring to an anticipated contravention was upheld because that recital was merely redundant and did not affect validity. Obstruction of officers executing the lawful seizure accordingly fell within section 186 of the Indian Penal Code.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>