<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 441 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169321</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court reaffirmed the binding nature of the quota rule on inter se seniority, emphasizing strict adherence and pushing down of officers to maintain the balance. It confirmed the continuation of the quota system during the relevant period and upheld the precedents set in Badami&#039;s case. The Court clarified that the three-year carry-forward rule from Iyer&#039;s case was not universally applicable. It urged compliance with the quota rule to avoid service litigations, allowing appeals of direct recruits and dismissing those of promotees without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:40:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 441 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169321</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court reaffirmed the binding nature of the quota rule on inter se seniority, emphasizing strict adherence and pushing down of officers to maintain the balance. It confirmed the continuation of the quota system during the relevant period and upheld the precedents set in Badami&#039;s case. The Court clarified that the three-year carry-forward rule from Iyer&#039;s case was not universally applicable. It urged compliance with the quota rule to avoid service litigations, allowing appeals of direct recruits and dismissing those of promotees without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>