<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 414 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169320</link>
    <description>The SC held that the rota-quota principle governed seniority only until the Customs Appraisers Service Class II Recruitment Rules, 1961 came into force. Because the Rules required at least 50% of cadre posts to be filled by direct recruitment without preserving a fixed promotee quota, the earlier rotational seniority basis lost its foundation thereafter. For Appraisers appointed on and from the 1961 Rules, seniority in the all-India combined list was to be determined by continuous officiation, while pre-1961 appointments remained subject to the earlier rota rule. The Tribunal&#039;s approach was therefore sustained with limited modification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:22:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 414 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169320</link>
      <description>The SC held that the rota-quota principle governed seniority only until the Customs Appraisers Service Class II Recruitment Rules, 1961 came into force. Because the Rules required at least 50% of cadre posts to be filled by direct recruitment without preserving a fixed promotee quota, the earlier rotational seniority basis lost its foundation thereafter. For Appraisers appointed on and from the 1961 Rules, seniority in the all-India combined list was to be determined by continuous officiation, while pre-1961 appointments remained subject to the earlier rota rule. The Tribunal&#039;s approach was therefore sustained with limited modification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>