<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 464 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258582</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ application, granting the petitioner an additional 30 days to respond to the show cause notice. The Court emphasized the need for the adjudicating authority to independently assess the application of the extended limitation period without bias from prior observations. The petitioner was allowed to present all arguments during the adjudication, with the Commissioner instructed to handle the matter in strict compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 464 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258582</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ application, granting the petitioner an additional 30 days to respond to the show cause notice. The Court emphasized the need for the adjudicating authority to independently assess the application of the extended limitation period without bias from prior observations. The petitioner was allowed to present all arguments during the adjudication, with the Commissioner instructed to handle the matter in strict compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>