<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 463 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258581</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F for Central Excise Appeals, emphasizing compliance with the amended provisions introduced in 2014. The judgment clarified the application of the law to ensure consistency and fairness in dealing with appeals involving duty and penalty disputes. The Court ruled that the amended provisions of Section 35F should apply to appeals filed before 06.08.2014, ensuring uniformity in pre-deposit requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 463 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258581</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F for Central Excise Appeals, emphasizing compliance with the amended provisions introduced in 2014. The judgment clarified the application of the law to ensure consistency and fairness in dealing with appeals involving duty and penalty disputes. The Court ruled that the amended provisions of Section 35F should apply to appeals filed before 06.08.2014, ensuring uniformity in pre-deposit requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>