https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258579 Territorial jurisdiction limited the demand to receipts attributable to the Delhi registered office, so receipts from Faridabad, Noida and Alwar were treated as prima facie outside the adjudicating authority's reach. For the balance within Delhi jurisdiction, the Tribunal accepted prima facie entitlement to 67% abatement while computing pre-deposit, directed deposit only on the remaining 33% of the relevant value, and allowed adjustment of amounts already paid. Recovery of the balance was stayed subject to compliance with the reduced pre-deposit direction. en-us Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Apr 2015 00:40:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258579 Territorial jurisdiction limited the demand to receipts attributable to the Delhi registered office, so receipts from Faridabad, Noida and Alwar were treated as prima facie outside the adjudicating authority's reach. For the balance within Delhi jurisdiction, the Tribunal accepted prima facie entitlement to 67% abatement while computing pre-deposit, directed deposit only on the remaining 33% of the relevant value, and allowed adjustment of amounts already paid. Recovery of the balance was stayed subject to compliance with the reduced pre-deposit direction. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258579