<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 451 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, upholding the contention that the imported goods were connectors in CKD condition and could be assembled into connectors. The Tribunal found that the goods, although in parts, could form complete connectors when assembled, aligning with the original adjudicating authority&#039;s findings and a re-examination report. Consequently, the appellants were granted consequential benefits under the customs notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 451 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, upholding the contention that the imported goods were connectors in CKD condition and could be assembled into connectors. The Tribunal found that the goods, although in parts, could form complete connectors when assembled, aligning with the original adjudicating authority&#039;s findings and a re-examination report. Consequently, the appellants were granted consequential benefits under the customs notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>