<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 447 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258565</link>
    <description>A charge-sheet and departmental proceedings are ordinarily not interfered with at the threshold unless the action is wholly without jurisdiction, tainted by mala fides, or vitiated by a grave procedural defect. On the facts noted, the disciplinary authority had considered the employee&#039;s representation, recorded reasons, and dealt with the complaint material, investigation record, approval chain, and supply of relied-upon documents before issuing the charge-sheet. The file material showed no predetermination, bias, or illegality warranting judicial intervention. The employee&#039;s objections were treated as matters for determination in the departmental enquiry, so the charge-sheet was not quashed at the initial stage and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 22:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 447 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258565</link>
      <description>A charge-sheet and departmental proceedings are ordinarily not interfered with at the threshold unless the action is wholly without jurisdiction, tainted by mala fides, or vitiated by a grave procedural defect. On the facts noted, the disciplinary authority had considered the employee&#039;s representation, recorded reasons, and dealt with the complaint material, investigation record, approval chain, and supply of relied-upon documents before issuing the charge-sheet. The file material showed no predetermination, bias, or illegality warranting judicial intervention. The employee&#039;s objections were treated as matters for determination in the departmental enquiry, so the charge-sheet was not quashed at the initial stage and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>