<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 440 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258558</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions of Rs. 7,10,94,646 and Rs. 1,46,25,071. It found the A.O.&#039;s application of the percentage of completion method and adoption of circle rates unjustified, as the methods were not mandatory or supported by valid grounds. The Tribunal referenced case law to support the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was rendered on 31.03.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 00:35:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 440 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258558</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions of Rs. 7,10,94,646 and Rs. 1,46,25,071. It found the A.O.&#039;s application of the percentage of completion method and adoption of circle rates unjustified, as the methods were not mandatory or supported by valid grounds. The Tribunal referenced case law to support the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was rendered on 31.03.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>