https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169313 In a challenge to preventive detention under s.3(1)(i) COFEPOSA, the detenu alleged vitiation for non-supply of three documents, including an earlier bail rejection order and the prosecution's counter in bail proceedings. The SC held the earlier bail rejection was immaterial because it was later superseded by a bail grant that had been supplied, and the detention grounds showed the detaining authority relied on the materials accompanying the grounds (statements, mahazars, etc.), not the alleged missing counter. On judicial review, the Court confined itself to examining the existence of subjective satisfaction and found sufficient material indicating organised foreign exchange collection and attempted smuggling of high-value goods; the writ petition was dismissed. en-us Wed, 23 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jan 2026 12:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169313 In a challenge to preventive detention under s.3(1)(i) COFEPOSA, the detenu alleged vitiation for non-supply of three documents, including an earlier bail rejection order and the prosecution's counter in bail proceedings. The SC held the earlier bail rejection was immaterial because it was later superseded by a bail grant that had been supplied, and the detention grounds showed the detaining authority relied on the materials accompanying the grounds (statements, mahazars, etc.), not the alleged missing counter. On judicial review, the Court confined itself to examining the existence of subjective satisfaction and found sufficient material indicating organised foreign exchange collection and attempted smuggling of high-value goods; the writ petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169313