<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 238 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169312</link>
    <description>Detention was held vitiated where the detaining authority failed to supply copies of material documents relied on in the grounds of detention, including the panchnama of seizure and the detenu&#039;s statement recorded under the Customs Act. Mere awareness of the contents of those documents was not treated as a substitute for furnishing the documents themselves, because the detenu must receive all material relied upon to make an effective representation. On that basis, the detention was invalidated and release was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 18:25:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 238 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169312</link>
      <description>Detention was held vitiated where the detaining authority failed to supply copies of material documents relied on in the grounds of detention, including the panchnama of seizure and the detenu&#039;s statement recorded under the Customs Act. Mere awareness of the contents of those documents was not treated as a substitute for furnishing the documents themselves, because the detenu must receive all material relied upon to make an effective representation. On that basis, the detention was invalidated and release was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>