<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 817 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169309</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC is a limited pre-arrest protection available only on a showing of reasonable grounds that arrest in a non-bailable offence is likely. It is distinct from regular bail under Section 439, which presupposes custody, and cannot be turned into a blanket immunity from arrest. An interim order restraining arrest is not contemplated by Section 438 because it would interfere with investigation and defeat the statutory custody requirement. On the stated facts, no case for anticipatory bail was made out, so rejection of the request and refusal of any restraint on arrest were justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 21:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 817 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169309</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC is a limited pre-arrest protection available only on a showing of reasonable grounds that arrest in a non-bailable offence is likely. It is distinct from regular bail under Section 439, which presupposes custody, and cannot be turned into a blanket immunity from arrest. An interim order restraining arrest is not contemplated by Section 438 because it would interfere with investigation and defeat the statutory custody requirement. On the stated facts, no case for anticipatory bail was made out, so rejection of the request and refusal of any restraint on arrest were justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>