<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 280 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169307</link>
    <description>The court held that the order of supersession dated February 27, 1980, was vitiated by the failure to observe the principles of natural justice. However, due to the impending expiry of the Committee&#039;s term, the court did not quash the notification or reinstate the Committee. The court acknowledged the invalidity of the notification, allowed the appeal, and granted costs to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:52:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 280 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169307</link>
      <description>The court held that the order of supersession dated February 27, 1980, was vitiated by the failure to observe the principles of natural justice. However, due to the impending expiry of the Committee&#039;s term, the court did not quash the notification or reinstate the Committee. The court acknowledged the invalidity of the notification, allowed the appeal, and granted costs to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>