https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169302 Under the State Panchayat law, nominated members were treated as validly included in the electoral roll only after publication of their names in the prescribed manner, and any consequential revision of the roll could operate only from that effective publication. The evidence did not show lawful publication of the corrections before the deadline, and the roll was not established to have been amended before 3.00 p.m. on 3 June 1988. The Court treated the later public declaration at 8.55 p.m. as the first effective publication in law, applying the principle that a legal alteration affecting rights must be made known by publication in the eye of law. The election challenge therefore succeeded. en-us Fri, 13 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:19:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169302 Under the State Panchayat law, nominated members were treated as validly included in the electoral roll only after publication of their names in the prescribed manner, and any consequential revision of the roll could operate only from that effective publication. The evidence did not show lawful publication of the corrections before the deadline, and the roll was not established to have been amended before 3.00 p.m. on 3 June 1988. The Court treated the later public declaration at 8.55 p.m. as the first effective publication in law, applying the principle that a legal alteration affecting rights must be made known by publication in the eye of law. The election challenge therefore succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169302