https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169294 Executive directions to the Administrator of Goa were valid under the Union's power over Union Territories, and the Administrator was bound to comply in the absence of any conflicting Presidential Regulation. The validating provisions in the Goa, Daman and Diu administration laws did not protect the petitioner's licence, because they were limited to acts done in good faith and did not create any continuing entitlement to future quota benefits. Refusal to grant a quota certificate did not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g), as the petitioner was not similarly situated to pre-liberation licence-holders and no vested right to import quota or licence was shown. en-us Fri, 07 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 08 Nov 2015 17:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169294 Executive directions to the Administrator of Goa were valid under the Union's power over Union Territories, and the Administrator was bound to comply in the absence of any conflicting Presidential Regulation. The validating provisions in the Goa, Daman and Diu administration laws did not protect the petitioner's licence, because they were limited to acts done in good faith and did not create any continuing entitlement to future quota benefits. Refusal to grant a quota certificate did not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g), as the petitioner was not similarly situated to pre-liberation licence-holders and no vested right to import quota or licence was shown. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 07 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169294