https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169293 A resumption notification was upheld where the land had originally been granted by the predecessor of the State Government and the Corporation had accepted that footing. The Court held that the matter had to be decided on the pleadings, so the Corporation could not raise a new factual basis at argument stage to deny the source of the grant. Because the transferor was properly identified as the State Government's predecessor, the resumption power under Section 81 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act applied. The Corporation was also estopped from disputing the source and character of the grant after taking the benefit of it, and the challenge to the notification failed. en-us Mon, 16 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:37:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169293 A resumption notification was upheld where the land had originally been granted by the predecessor of the State Government and the Corporation had accepted that footing. The Court held that the matter had to be decided on the pleadings, so the Corporation could not raise a new factual basis at argument stage to deny the source of the grant. Because the transferor was properly identified as the State Government's predecessor, the resumption power under Section 81 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act applied. The Corporation was also estopped from disputing the source and character of the grant after taking the benefit of it, and the challenge to the notification failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169293