https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169292 The court allowed the appeal, preventing the Settlement Commission from proceeding with the respondent's application. The assessee's appeals before the I.T.A.T. were reinstated for prompt resolution, while the Department's appeals remained dismissed as lacking merit. The court stressed the need to curb the misuse of the Settlement Commission by substantial tax evaders, ensuring compliance with statutory duties and public policy. en-us Fri, 04 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169292 The court allowed the appeal, preventing the Settlement Commission from proceeding with the respondent's application. The assessee's appeals before the I.T.A.T. were reinstated for prompt resolution, while the Department's appeals remained dismissed as lacking merit. The court stressed the need to curb the misuse of the Settlement Commission by substantial tax evaders, ensuring compliance with statutory duties and public policy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169292