https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169291 A firm whose partners are Indian citizens can maintain a writ petition under Article 32, because the firm is treated as representing those citizens collectively. The import-control policy discussed was an administrative statement, not a statutory instrument, so it did not create an absolute or vested right to an import licence. An applicant had no enforceable right to insist on consideration under the policy in force when the application was made. In the absence of hostile discrimination, jurisdictional error, mala fides, or breach of natural justice, refusal of the licences was not held to infringe Articles 14 or 19(1)(g), and no mandamus or certiorari was warranted. en-us Fri, 26 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 08 Nov 2015 19:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169291 A firm whose partners are Indian citizens can maintain a writ petition under Article 32, because the firm is treated as representing those citizens collectively. The import-control policy discussed was an administrative statement, not a statutory instrument, so it did not create an absolute or vested right to an import licence. An applicant had no enforceable right to insist on consideration under the policy in force when the application was made. In the absence of hostile discrimination, jurisdictional error, mala fides, or breach of natural justice, refusal of the licences was not held to infringe Articles 14 or 19(1)(g), and no mandamus or certiorari was warranted. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 26 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169291