https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169291 The Court dismissed the petitions, ruling that the delay in disposal of import license applications was not undue, the rejection of applications was lawful based on the amended Import Trade Control Policy, and there was no violation of fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that applicants do not have an absolute right to an import license based on a specific policy, which can be altered by administrative orders. The rejection was deemed valid due to the prohibition in the amended policy regarding the materials in question. en-us Fri, 26 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 08 Nov 2015 19:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169291 The Court dismissed the petitions, ruling that the delay in disposal of import license applications was not undue, the rejection of applications was lawful based on the amended Import Trade Control Policy, and there was no violation of fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that applicants do not have an absolute right to an import license based on a specific policy, which can be altered by administrative orders. The rejection was deemed valid due to the prohibition in the amended policy regarding the materials in question. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 26 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169291