<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (9) TMI 54 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169287</link>
    <description>Municipal bye-laws licensing and regulating a grain market were treated as within the Board&#039;s competence under the United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916. Section 241(1) was read as confined to markets for animals, meat, fish, fruit and vegetables intended for human food, so it did not govern a grain market. The broader rule-making power under section 298, including authority to regulate markets, impose licensing conditions and fees, and make bye-laws for health, safety, convenience and municipal administration, supported the impugned clauses. An incorrect recital of the source of power in the preamble did not invalidate otherwise competent bye-laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:23:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (9) TMI 54 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169287</link>
      <description>Municipal bye-laws licensing and regulating a grain market were treated as within the Board&#039;s competence under the United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916. Section 241(1) was read as confined to markets for animals, meat, fish, fruit and vegetables intended for human food, so it did not govern a grain market. The broader rule-making power under section 298, including authority to regulate markets, impose licensing conditions and fees, and make bye-laws for health, safety, convenience and municipal administration, supported the impugned clauses. An incorrect recital of the source of power in the preamble did not invalidate otherwise competent bye-laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>