https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169286 Officials conducting a customs raid at premises used for licensed gold-related activity were found, on a prima facie basis, to be protected by Section 108 of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 because the raid was aimed at detecting possible illegal activity and there was no showing of unlawful trespass. The Court treated the acts as done in good faith in performance of statutory functions and held that allowing the prosecution to proceed would undermine that immunity. Interference under Article 136 was declined, and the complaint was quashed. en-us Fri, 06 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:10:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169286 Officials conducting a customs raid at premises used for licensed gold-related activity were found, on a prima facie basis, to be protected by Section 108 of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 because the raid was aimed at detecting possible illegal activity and there was no showing of unlawful trespass. The Court treated the acts as done in good faith in performance of statutory functions and held that allowing the prosecution to proceed would undermine that immunity. Interference under Article 136 was declined, and the complaint was quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169286