<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 252 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169285</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision, determining that octroi duty does not apply to petroleum products re-exported outside municipal limits. It affirmed the validity of Section 113 of the Punjab Municipal Corporation Act when interpreted in line with Entry 52 of List II of Schedule VII. The appellant&#039;s request for a refund of previously paid octroi duty was rejected, with the court specifying that future collections of such duty should be remitted to the Municipal Corporation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:31:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 252 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169285</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision, determining that octroi duty does not apply to petroleum products re-exported outside municipal limits. It affirmed the validity of Section 113 of the Punjab Municipal Corporation Act when interpreted in line with Entry 52 of List II of Schedule VII. The appellant&#039;s request for a refund of previously paid octroi duty was rejected, with the court specifying that future collections of such duty should be remitted to the Municipal Corporation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>