<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (9) TMI 70 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169283</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952, and the notifications issued under Sections 15 and 16 of the Act. The restrictions imposed were deemed reasonable and in the interest of public welfare, not violating relevant articles of the Constitution. The Court emphasized the importance of regulating forward trading to prevent undesirable practices and stabilize the market, dismissing the petitions challenging the Act and notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:23:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (9) TMI 70 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169283</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952, and the notifications issued under Sections 15 and 16 of the Act. The restrictions imposed were deemed reasonable and in the interest of public welfare, not violating relevant articles of the Constitution. The Court emphasized the importance of regulating forward trading to prevent undesirable practices and stabilize the market, dismissing the petitions challenging the Act and notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>