https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258540 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax due to the petitioner's failure to file the appeal within the condonable period under Section 35(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite exhausting all alternative remedies unsuccessfully, the court held that once the appeal period lapses, intentional or unintentional, the remedy is barred. Emphasizing the rigidity of Section 35(1) and the petitioner's delay in approaching the court, the court concluded that the petitioner forfeited their remedy by not adhering to the prescribed time limits. en-us Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258540 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax due to the petitioner's failure to file the appeal within the condonable period under Section 35(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite exhausting all alternative remedies unsuccessfully, the court held that once the appeal period lapses, intentional or unintentional, the remedy is barred. Emphasizing the rigidity of Section 35(1) and the petitioner's delay in approaching the court, the court concluded that the petitioner forfeited their remedy by not adhering to the prescribed time limits. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258540