<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 419 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258537</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals and ruling that the appellant did not suppress facts to evade duty. The demand for duty invoking the extended period was time-barred, and the imposition of interest and penalties was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal highlighted the revenue-neutral aspect of the case, acknowledging the appellant&#039;s efforts to rectify the software issue and fulfill duty obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 419 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258537</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals and ruling that the appellant did not suppress facts to evade duty. The demand for duty invoking the extended period was time-barred, and the imposition of interest and penalties was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal highlighted the revenue-neutral aspect of the case, acknowledging the appellant&#039;s efforts to rectify the software issue and fulfill duty obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>