<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 418 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258536</link>
    <description>A preparation made from basic food ingredients and consumable after adding water was treated as an instant food mix classifiable under Heading 2106, rather than a food supplement outside the exemption. The exemption entry was read to cover all kinds of food mixes, including instant food mixes, and the product&#039;s use as a meal replacement or by patients recovering from illness did not remove it from that scope. An expert certificate supported the classification, and a Board circular on ready-to-eat packaged food was held inapplicable to the food-mix dispute. On that basis, the exemption was applied and the demand and penalty were held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 418 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258536</link>
      <description>A preparation made from basic food ingredients and consumable after adding water was treated as an instant food mix classifiable under Heading 2106, rather than a food supplement outside the exemption. The exemption entry was read to cover all kinds of food mixes, including instant food mixes, and the product&#039;s use as a meal replacement or by patients recovering from illness did not remove it from that scope. An expert certificate supported the classification, and a Board circular on ready-to-eat packaged food was held inapplicable to the food-mix dispute. On that basis, the exemption was applied and the demand and penalty were held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>