<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 418 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258536</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that &quot;Fresubin&quot; should be classified as an &#039;instant food mix&#039; for duty exemption under Notification No. 3/2006 - CE. The Tribunal found that the product, made from basic food ingredients and capable of consumption by adding water, met the criteria of SI. No. 30A of the notification. It emphasized that the expert certification and ingredients supported this classification, rejecting the department&#039;s argument that it was a food supplement. The Tribunal set aside the department&#039;s orders and allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 418 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258536</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that &quot;Fresubin&quot; should be classified as an &#039;instant food mix&#039; for duty exemption under Notification No. 3/2006 - CE. The Tribunal found that the product, made from basic food ingredients and capable of consumption by adding water, met the criteria of SI. No. 30A of the notification. It emphasized that the expert certification and ingredients supported this classification, rejecting the department&#039;s argument that it was a food supplement. The Tribunal set aside the department&#039;s orders and allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>