https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258532 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the High Court's decision to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. The Court emphasized the Special Judge's jurisdiction to try offences under the IPC and Companies Act, rejecting the High Court's finding that the Special Judge lacked jurisdiction. The Supreme Court highlighted the authority of the Special Court to try offences under multiple enactments arising from the same transaction, ensuring all accused individuals face trial for alleged offences under the IPC and Companies Act as per the complaint. en-us Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 12 Apr 2015 12:50:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258532 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the High Court's decision to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. The Court emphasized the Special Judge's jurisdiction to try offences under the IPC and Companies Act, rejecting the High Court's finding that the Special Judge lacked jurisdiction. The Supreme Court highlighted the authority of the Special Court to try offences under multiple enactments arising from the same transaction, ensuring all accused individuals face trial for alleged offences under the IPC and Companies Act as per the complaint. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258532