<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 414 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258532</link>
    <description>A restriction under Section 621 of the Companies Act, 1956 on who may institute a complaint applies only to offences under that Act and does not by itself require quashing of independent Indian Penal Code allegations such as cheating or criminal conspiracy. Where the complaint discloses IPC offences in addition to Companies Act offences, a defect in competence to complain under the Companies Act cannot defeat the entire prosecution. The Special Court may also try allied IPC offences when they arise from the same transaction as the Companies Act offences, avoiding multiplicity of proceedings. On that basis, the quashing order was interfered with and the accused were left to face trial before the Special Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2015 12:50:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 414 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258532</link>
      <description>A restriction under Section 621 of the Companies Act, 1956 on who may institute a complaint applies only to offences under that Act and does not by itself require quashing of independent Indian Penal Code allegations such as cheating or criminal conspiracy. Where the complaint discloses IPC offences in addition to Companies Act offences, a defect in competence to complain under the Companies Act cannot defeat the entire prosecution. The Special Court may also try allied IPC offences when they arise from the same transaction as the Companies Act offences, avoiding multiplicity of proceedings. On that basis, the quashing order was interfered with and the accused were left to face trial before the Special Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>