<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 407 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258525</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Appeal, setting aside the previous order and remanding the matter for reconsideration in accordance with established legal principles and guidelines provided in relevant judgments. The dispute centered on whether standard rent or municipal rateable value should be used in computing property income under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the importance of standard rent as an upper limit for determining annual letting value, especially in cases involving rent control legislation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 407 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258525</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Appeal, setting aside the previous order and remanding the matter for reconsideration in accordance with established legal principles and guidelines provided in relevant judgments. The dispute centered on whether standard rent or municipal rateable value should be used in computing property income under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the importance of standard rent as an upper limit for determining annual letting value, especially in cases involving rent control legislation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>