<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 399 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee for both assessment years, holding that the additions made were beyond the scope of assessment under Section 153A due to the lack of incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the additions, as they became purely academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 399 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee for both assessment years, holding that the additions made were beyond the scope of assessment under Section 153A due to the lack of incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the additions, as they became purely academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>