<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (3) TMI 105 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169282</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Union of India must issue a speaking order when dismissing a revision, emphasizing transparency and accountability. It ruled that the Central Government violated principles of natural justice by not providing reasons for its decision and not granting a personal hearing. The Court highlighted the necessity for the Central Government to provide reasons for its decisions in quasi-judicial functions to prevent arbitrariness. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeals, set aside the Central Government&#039;s orders, and directed a fresh review considering the observations, emphasizing the importance of reasoned decisions for fairness and accountability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2015 12:44:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (3) TMI 105 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169282</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Union of India must issue a speaking order when dismissing a revision, emphasizing transparency and accountability. It ruled that the Central Government violated principles of natural justice by not providing reasons for its decision and not granting a personal hearing. The Court highlighted the necessity for the Central Government to provide reasons for its decisions in quasi-judicial functions to prevent arbitrariness. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeals, set aside the Central Government&#039;s orders, and directed a fresh review considering the observations, emphasizing the importance of reasoned decisions for fairness and accountability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>