<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 395 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258513</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand of ineligible Cenvat credit and interest within the limitation period for all appellants. However, it set aside demands invoking the extended period and penalties imposed on the appellants. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of TTL concerning the denial of Cenvat credit on service tax paid for group insurance of employees. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2015 02:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 395 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258513</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand of ineligible Cenvat credit and interest within the limitation period for all appellants. However, it set aside demands invoking the extended period and penalties imposed on the appellants. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of TTL concerning the denial of Cenvat credit on service tax paid for group insurance of employees. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>