<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 390 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258508</link>
    <description>Where a dealer specifically sought a personal hearing in objections to proposed assessment revision, denial of that hearing before revising the assessment and levying penalty amounted to breach of natural justice. In proceedings involving disputed factual questions, fairness required the assessing authority to grant a personal hearing when requested. The assessment orders were therefore unsustainable for want of reasonable opportunity and were liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2015 01:09:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 390 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258508</link>
      <description>Where a dealer specifically sought a personal hearing in objections to proposed assessment revision, denial of that hearing before revising the assessment and levying penalty amounted to breach of natural justice. In proceedings involving disputed factual questions, fairness required the assessing authority to grant a personal hearing when requested. The assessment orders were therefore unsustainable for want of reasonable opportunity and were liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>