<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 381 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of confirming ongoing litigation to facilitate revalidation of DFIA licenses. It directed the Customs department to issue the necessary certificate to DGFT within two weeks for revalidation, highlighting the unfairness of denying benefits due to Customs&#039; actions when substantial investments were made in acquiring the licenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 381 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of confirming ongoing litigation to facilitate revalidation of DFIA licenses. It directed the Customs department to issue the necessary certificate to DGFT within two weeks for revalidation, highlighting the unfairness of denying benefits due to Customs&#039; actions when substantial investments were made in acquiring the licenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>