<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 375 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258493</link>
    <description>Section 80-IA deduction is a profit-linked incentive, and the deeming fiction in sub-section (5) applies only to computing the eligible business&#039;s deduction for the relevant years. Earlier losses that have already been set off against other income cannot be reopened, notionally carried forward again, or adjusted a second time for recomputation of the deduction. The Court followed its earlier view and the Rajasthan High Court&#039;s reasoning, holding that the fiction is confined to its limited purpose and does not permit revival of absorbed losses. The resulting position favoured the assessee and rejected the Revenue&#039;s attempt to rework the deduction base.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:58:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 375 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258493</link>
      <description>Section 80-IA deduction is a profit-linked incentive, and the deeming fiction in sub-section (5) applies only to computing the eligible business&#039;s deduction for the relevant years. Earlier losses that have already been set off against other income cannot be reopened, notionally carried forward again, or adjusted a second time for recomputation of the deduction. The Court followed its earlier view and the Rajasthan High Court&#039;s reasoning, holding that the fiction is confined to its limited purpose and does not permit revival of absorbed losses. The resulting position favoured the assessee and rejected the Revenue&#039;s attempt to rework the deduction base.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>