https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169278 The Court rejected challenges to the legality of the reference to the Advisory Board, affirmed the authority of the Minister of State to dispose of the representation, and found no violation in denying legal representation before the Advisory Board. Additionally, the Court dismissed claims of non-application of mind by the detaining authority. Both writ petitions were ultimately dismissed, with the Court finding no constitutional or legal flaws in the actions of the Government and detaining authority. en-us Tue, 28 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:50:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169278 The Court rejected challenges to the legality of the reference to the Advisory Board, affirmed the authority of the Minister of State to dispose of the representation, and found no violation in denying legal representation before the Advisory Board. Additionally, the Court dismissed claims of non-application of mind by the detaining authority. Both writ petitions were ultimately dismissed, with the Court finding no constitutional or legal flaws in the actions of the Government and detaining authority. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169278