<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (5) TMI 361 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169275</link>
    <description>The appeal under section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act was dismissed by the Court as incompetent since no punishment was imposed by the High Court. The Court held that the right of appeal under section 19(1) is only against decisions or orders of a High Court passed in the exercise of its jurisdiction to punish for contempt. As the High Court&#039;s decision did not involve punishment for contempt, the appeal was found to lack jurisdiction and was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:04:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (5) TMI 361 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169275</link>
      <description>The appeal under section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act was dismissed by the Court as incompetent since no punishment was imposed by the High Court. The Court held that the right of appeal under section 19(1) is only against decisions or orders of a High Court passed in the exercise of its jurisdiction to punish for contempt. As the High Court&#039;s decision did not involve punishment for contempt, the appeal was found to lack jurisdiction and was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>