https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169276 The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling it was not maintainable under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The Court emphasized that the jurisdiction to punish for contempt begins only when the Court initiates proceedings, and a refusal to initiate does not constitute an exercise of this jurisdiction. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed without any order as to costs. en-us Fri, 21 Jun 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:07:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169276 The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling it was not maintainable under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The Court emphasized that the jurisdiction to punish for contempt begins only when the Court initiates proceedings, and a refusal to initiate does not constitute an exercise of this jurisdiction. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed without any order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Jun 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169276