<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CESTAT Decision on Holograms Contradicts Previous Rulings, Lacks Rationale, and Raises Classification Criteria Concerns.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22472</link>
    <description>Classification of Holograms and Holographic films - CESTAT arrives at the exactly opposite result without telling us why. Secondly, we are again left guessing as to how the self adhesive aspect of the product is more important than the security aspect of the said product. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:27:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:27:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CESTAT Decision on Holograms Contradicts Previous Rulings, Lacks Rationale, and Raises Classification Criteria Concerns.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22472</link>
      <description>Classification of Holograms and Holographic films - CESTAT arrives at the exactly opposite result without telling us why. Secondly, we are again left guessing as to how the self adhesive aspect of the product is more important than the security aspect of the said product. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:27:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>