https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169270 A dispute amounts to land grabbing under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 only where there is actual illegal dispossession or unlawful taking of possession; a mere attempt to obtain possession is insufficient. A void transfer by a protected tenant, made in breach of tenancy law and relating to agricultural land, cannot be validated under Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The Special Court under the land grabbing statute is confined to determining whether land grabbing occurred and who is responsible; it cannot decide title by adverse possession. The High Court's interference was upheld and the appeals failed. en-us Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169270 A dispute amounts to land grabbing under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 only where there is actual illegal dispossession or unlawful taking of possession; a mere attempt to obtain possession is insufficient. A void transfer by a protected tenant, made in breach of tenancy law and relating to agricultural land, cannot be validated under Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The Special Court under the land grabbing statute is confined to determining whether land grabbing occurred and who is responsible; it cannot decide title by adverse possession. The High Court's interference was upheld and the appeals failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169270