https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258461 The Commission concluded that no prima facie case existed against the Opposite Parties under Sections 3 or 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. It determined that the entities involved did not qualify as enterprises engaged in economic activities, rendering Section 4 inapplicable. Furthermore, the Informant failed to provide concrete evidence of any agreement violating Section 3. Consequently, the Commission decided to close the proceedings under Section 26(2) of the Act and directed the Secretary to communicate this decision to the involved parties. en-us Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:10:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258461 The Commission concluded that no prima facie case existed against the Opposite Parties under Sections 3 or 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. It determined that the entities involved did not qualify as enterprises engaged in economic activities, rendering Section 4 inapplicable. Furthermore, the Informant failed to provide concrete evidence of any agreement violating Section 3. Consequently, the Commission decided to close the proceedings under Section 26(2) of the Act and directed the Secretary to communicate this decision to the involved parties. Case-Laws Law of Competition Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258461