https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169263 The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act and Section 162(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ruling that they do not violate Article 14. The Court reinstated the trial court's conviction and death sentence for the accused based on strong circumstantial evidence linking him to the murder of a defenseless old woman. The Court found the death sentence appropriate due to the brutal and premeditated nature of the crime. en-us Fri, 06 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Apr 2015 16:18:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169263 The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act and Section 162(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ruling that they do not violate Article 14. The Court reinstated the trial court's conviction and death sentence for the accused based on strong circumstantial evidence linking him to the murder of a defenseless old woman. The Court found the death sentence appropriate due to the brutal and premeditated nature of the crime. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169263