https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169259 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant lacked the locus standi to challenge the No-objection Certificate. The Court emphasized that the appellant's failure to object during the relevant stage and the absence of a substantive legal right precluded him from being considered an "aggrieved person." The decision underscored the necessity of strict standing requirements for invoking Article 226 jurisdiction to deter frivolous litigation and ensure judicial review is pursued by those with genuine legal grievances. en-us Fri, 19 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:42:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169259 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant lacked the locus standi to challenge the No-objection Certificate. The Court emphasized that the appellant's failure to object during the relevant stage and the absence of a substantive legal right precluded him from being considered an "aggrieved person." The decision underscored the necessity of strict standing requirements for invoking Article 226 jurisdiction to deter frivolous litigation and ensure judicial review is pursued by those with genuine legal grievances. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169259