https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169258 The Supreme Court held that the Advocate-General was not a "person aggrieved" under Section 37 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The court reasoned that the Advocate-General's role was advisory and did not represent any specific interest or suffer a legal grievance from the Disciplinary Committee's decision. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Advocate-General was deemed incompetent, and the court set aside the order of the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India. en-us Fri, 21 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:19:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169258 The Supreme Court held that the Advocate-General was not a "person aggrieved" under Section 37 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The court reasoned that the Advocate-General's role was advisory and did not represent any specific interest or suffer a legal grievance from the Disciplinary Committee's decision. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Advocate-General was deemed incompetent, and the court set aside the order of the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169258