https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169258 In disciplinary proceedings under the Advocates Act, the meaning of "person aggrieved" depends on the statutory scheme. The majority view states that the Advocate-General, though notified and heard under section 35, is not a party to the proceedings and has only an advisory or assistive role; mere disagreement with the disciplinary committee does not create a sufficient legal grievance to appeal under section 37. The dissenting view treats the Advocate-General's statutory notice, hearing, and role in maintaining professional standards as enough to confer appellate standing. The commentary therefore presents a split on whether section 37 permits such an appeal. en-us Fri, 21 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:19:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169258 In disciplinary proceedings under the Advocates Act, the meaning of "person aggrieved" depends on the statutory scheme. The majority view states that the Advocate-General, though notified and heard under section 35, is not a party to the proceedings and has only an advisory or assistive role; mere disagreement with the disciplinary committee does not create a sufficient legal grievance to appeal under section 37. The dissenting view treats the Advocate-General's statutory notice, hearing, and role in maintaining professional standards as enough to confer appellate standing. The commentary therefore presents a split on whether section 37 permits such an appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169258