https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169257 The Supreme Court held that the Bar Council of a State is considered "a person aggrieved" under section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961. Consequently, the Bar Council of Maharashtra had the standing to appeal to the Supreme Court against decisions of the disciplinary committee of the Bar Council of India. The Court emphasized the Bar Council's role in maintaining professional standards and safeguarding the integrity of the legal profession, allowing the appeals to proceed for a substantive hearing before a Division Bench. en-us Wed, 13 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Apr 2015 12:20:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169257 The Supreme Court held that the Bar Council of a State is considered "a person aggrieved" under section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961. Consequently, the Bar Council of Maharashtra had the standing to appeal to the Supreme Court against decisions of the disciplinary committee of the Bar Council of India. The Court emphasized the Bar Council's role in maintaining professional standards and safeguarding the integrity of the legal profession, allowing the appeals to proceed for a substantive hearing before a Division Bench. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169257