https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169255 The civil court's jurisdiction was not excluded because Section 48(1) of the Bihar and Orissa Co-operative Societies Act applied only to disputes within the specific classes listed there, and the Explanation could not enlarge that substantive category. The dispute, not falling within those classes, remained triable in civil court. On liability, payment on a forged cheque was made without any valid mandate, so the bank could not avoid responsibility by alleging negligence on the part of the plaintiff society or its officer. The loss was attributed to the bank's negligence and employee complicity, and liability against the bank and the other liable defendants was maintained. en-us Wed, 12 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Sep 2017 14:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169255 The civil court's jurisdiction was not excluded because Section 48(1) of the Bihar and Orissa Co-operative Societies Act applied only to disputes within the specific classes listed there, and the Explanation could not enlarge that substantive category. The dispute, not falling within those classes, remained triable in civil court. On liability, payment on a forged cheque was made without any valid mandate, so the bank could not avoid responsibility by alleging negligence on the part of the plaintiff society or its officer. The loss was attributed to the bank's negligence and employee complicity, and liability against the bank and the other liable defendants was maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169255