<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (10) TMI 145 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169255</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment of the High Court and restoring the decree of the Subordinate Judge. It held that the civil court had jurisdiction over the dispute and found the Bank of Bihar Ltd. liable for the fraudulent withdrawal of funds due to its gross negligence. The Union was absolved of contributory negligence. The appeal was allowed, and other respondents were ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (10) TMI 145 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169255</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment of the High Court and restoring the decree of the Subordinate Judge. It held that the civil court had jurisdiction over the dispute and found the Bank of Bihar Ltd. liable for the fraudulent withdrawal of funds due to its gross negligence. The Union was absolved of contributory negligence. The appeal was allowed, and other respondents were ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>