<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 319 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258437</link>
    <description>Input tax credit cannot ordinarily be reversed from a purchasing dealer merely because the selling dealer allegedly failed to remit tax, where the purchaser has paid tax and validly claimed credit. The department must verify the purchase records before fastening liability, and if the documents show that tax was not paid on the purchases, recovery may be made in accordance with law. A notice based only on the seller&#039;s default is therefore not sufficient for final recovery without examination of the relevant transactions. The matter is to be treated as a show-cause notice, with the dealer required to produce purchase records and submit an explanation for fresh adjudication on verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:03:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 319 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258437</link>
      <description>Input tax credit cannot ordinarily be reversed from a purchasing dealer merely because the selling dealer allegedly failed to remit tax, where the purchaser has paid tax and validly claimed credit. The department must verify the purchase records before fastening liability, and if the documents show that tax was not paid on the purchases, recovery may be made in accordance with law. A notice based only on the seller&#039;s default is therefore not sufficient for final recovery without examination of the relevant transactions. The matter is to be treated as a show-cause notice, with the dealer required to produce purchase records and submit an explanation for fresh adjudication on verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>