https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258430 The appeal against the disallowed refund claim was dismissed by the Tribunal. Both the adjudication and appellate authorities rejected the claim due to insufficient evidence, including discrepancies in submitted documents and failure to provide original documents as required by Rule 11 of CER 2002. Previous cases also highlighted the appellants' consistent failure to meet evidentiary standards. The Tribunal upheld the lower authority's decision, emphasizing the importance of complying with procedural and evidentiary requirements for refund claims under the Central Excise Act. en-us Mon, 23 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:00:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258430 The appeal against the disallowed refund claim was dismissed by the Tribunal. Both the adjudication and appellate authorities rejected the claim due to insufficient evidence, including discrepancies in submitted documents and failure to provide original documents as required by Rule 11 of CER 2002. Previous cases also highlighted the appellants' consistent failure to meet evidentiary standards. The Tribunal upheld the lower authority's decision, emphasizing the importance of complying with procedural and evidentiary requirements for refund claims under the Central Excise Act. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258430